Skip to main content

The 10 Pillars of Science-Based Plan Design

Based on comprehensive research of peer-reviewed studies, meta-analyses, and evidence-based guidelines. Status: Research Complete


Quick Reference

#PillarKey MetricPrimary Source
1Volume10-20 sets/muscle/weekPelland et al. 2024
2Intensity0-5 RIR, 65-85% 1RMHelms et al. 2018
3Frequency2x/muscle/weekSchoenfeld et al. 2016
4Rest Periods60-120s hypertrophy, 3-5min strengthSinger et al. 2024
5Exercise SelectionCompounds first, then isolationSimao et al. 2007
6Progressive OverloadIncrease load OR reps over timePMC 2022
7Tempo2-8 sec/rep, 20-70 sec/setPMC 2021
8PeriodizationVary training every 4-6 weeksStronger by Science
9RecoveryDeload every 4-8 weeksPMC 2024
10External FactorsSleep, nutrition, stress, balancePMC 2023

Pillar 1: Volume (Sets per Muscle per Week)

The most important variable for muscle growth.

Volume Guidelines by Training Status

Training StatusMinimumOptimalUpper Limit
Beginner4 sets10 sets12 sets
Intermediate10 sets12-16 sets20 sets
Advanced12 sets16-20 sets20+ (diminishing returns)

Key Research Findings

Pelland et al. 2024 Meta-Analysis (67 studies, 2,058 participants):

  • Minimum 4 sets/week to stimulate growth
  • 5-10 sets optimizes gains
  • Beyond 20 sets = diminishing returns
  • Per-session: 6-8 hard sets optimal when resting 2+ min

Volume Cycling Strategy:

  • Alternating high-volume phases with maintenance phases is more practical
  • Muscle gains can be maintained with a fraction of the initial volume

Application in Mo

function calculateVolume(experience: string, goal: string, recovery: string): number {
const baseVolume = {
beginner: 10,
intermediate: 14,
advanced: 18
}[experience];

// Adjust for recovery capacity
const recoveryMultiplier = {
low: 0.8,
moderate: 1.0,
high: 1.1
}[recovery];

return Math.round(baseVolume * recoveryMultiplier);
}

Sources: SportRxiv, Weightology, PMC


Pillar 2: Intensity (How Hard You Work)

Two complementary systems for prescribing intensity.

A. Percentage of 1RM

Goal% 1RM Range
Power30-60%
Hypertrophy65-85%
Strength80-90%
Max Strength90-100%

B. RPE/RIR (Autoregulation)

RPERIRDescription
100Absolute failure, no more reps possible
91Could maybe do 1 more rep
82Could do 2 more with good form
73Weight moves quickly, 3 reps left
64Moderate effort, warm-up territory

Proximity to Failure Research

Key Finding: The "sweet spot" for hypertrophy is 0-5 reps from failure.

ApproachHypertrophyStrengthRecovery
Training TO failureEffectiveEffectivePoor recovery, more soreness
1-2 RIREqually effectiveEffectiveBetter recovery
3+ RIRUnclear if optimalStill effectiveBest recovery

Research Finding: RPE-based training produces similar hypertrophy but potentially better strength gains due to autoregulation of daily readiness.

Sources: Frontiers, PMC, Tandfonline


Pillar 3: Frequency (How Often per Muscle)

Based on Muscle Protein Synthesis (MPS) research.

MPS Time Course

Training Session
|
+4 hours: MPS elevated 50%
+24 hours: MPS elevated 109% (PEAK)
+36 hours: MPS returning to baseline (~14% above)
+48 hours: MPS back to baseline

Frequency Recommendations

FrequencyVerdictBest For
1x/weekSuboptimalNot recommended
2x/weekSweet spotMost lifters
3x/weekGoodBeginners, time-efficient

Key Research Finding

When volume is equated, frequency has minimal impact on hypertrophy.

The "bro split" fails not because of low frequency, but because it blasts too much volume in one session (20+ sets) when 6-8 sets per session is optimal.

Better Approach: Split volume across 2-3 sessions per muscle per week.

Sources: PubMed, Stronger by Science


Pillar 4: Rest Periods

2024 Bayesian Meta-Analysis findings (Singer, Wolf, Schoenfeld et al.)

Rest Period Guidelines

Rest DurationHypertrophy EffectBest For
<60 secondsDiminished growthMetabolic conditioning
60-120 secondsOptimalHypertrophy
2-3 minutesSimilar to 60-120sCompound exercises
3+ minutesSlightly reduced gainsStrength training
3-5 minutesOptimal for strengthHeavy compounds

Muscle-Specific Considerations

  • Legs: Benefit from longer rest (more muscle mass involved)
  • Arms: Can use shorter rest
  • Compounds: Need longer rest than isolation movements

Auto-Regulated Rest

Research shows that resting as long as you feel you need works just as well as prescribed rest periods.

Sources: Frontiers 2024, PMC


Pillar 5: Exercise Selection & Order

Selection Principles

  1. Compound exercises = foundation (squat, bench, deadlift, rows, OHP)
  2. Isolation exercises = supplement for targeted growth
  3. EMG research shows compounds produce greater overall muscle activation

EMG Data: Best Exercises by Muscle Group

Muscle GroupBest ExerciseEMG Activation
Legs (overall)Barbell Back SquatHighest quad, ham, glute activation
BackPull-up (wide grip)117% MVC lats, 92% mid-trap
ShouldersOverhead Barbell Press79% anterior delt, 66% lateral delt
TricepsDips (weighted)85-90% triceps activation
GlutesHip Thrust16% higher glute max than squats

Exercise Order Rules

PriorityExercise TypeReason
1stCompoundsMost fatiguing, need fresh CNS
2ndSecondary compoundsStill demanding
3rdIsolationLess fatiguing, can train fatigued
4thCore/AccessoryLeast demanding

Pre-Exhaustion Exception

For lagging muscle groups, doing isolation first can help target them, but expect reduced performance on subsequent compounds.

Key Finding: Exercise order doesn't significantly affect hypertrophy, but does affect strength on specific lifts. Order based on what you care most about.

Sources: Jefit EMG Data, PubMed


Pillar 6: Progressive Overload

The fundamental principle - you must increase demands over time.

Methods of Progressive Overload

MethodHowBest For
Add weight+2.5-5% per weekBeginners (linear progression)
Add repsSame weight, more repsIntermediate+
Double progressionRep range -> add weight at topLong-term progress
Add setsMore volumeBreaking plateaus
Improve techniqueBetter ROM, slower tempoAll levels

Double Progression Method

Target: 3 sets x 8-12 reps

Week 1: 100 lbs x 8, 8, 8 reps
Week 2: 100 lbs x 9, 9, 8 reps
Week 3: 100 lbs x 10, 10, 9 reps
Week 4: 100 lbs x 12, 11, 11 reps
Week 5: 105 lbs x 8, 8, 8 reps <- Reset to bottom of range

Key Research Findings

  • Load progression and rep progression produce equal muscle growth
  • The 10% Rule: Never increase load/volume by >10%/week
  • 2-for-2 Rule: Increase weight when you can do 2+ extra reps on last set for 2 weeks

Sources: PMC, Legion


Pillar 7: Tempo & Time Under Tension

Often overlooked but important for hypertrophy.

Optimal Ranges

VariableOptimal RangeNotes
Rep duration2-8 secondsVery slow (>10s) = less effective
Set duration (TUT)20-70 secondsFor hypertrophy
Eccentric emphasisSlightly longerCan boost hypertrophy

Tempo Notation: Eccentric-Pause-Concentric-Pause

Example: 3-1-2-0

3 = 3 seconds lowering (eccentric)
1 = 1 second pause at bottom
2 = 2 seconds lifting (concentric)
0 = No pause at top

X = Explosive/as fast as possible

Goal-Based Tempo Recommendations

GoalRecommended TempoTotal Rep Time
Hypertrophy3-1-2-06 seconds
Strength2-1-X-03-4 seconds
Power1-0-X-01-2 seconds
Metabolic2-0-2-04 seconds

Key Finding

Reps from 5-50 produce similar muscle growth IF taken close to failure. TUT matters less than proximity to failure.

Sources: PMC, Men's Health


Pillar 8: Periodization

Varying training over time to prevent plateaus and optimize adaptations.

Periodization Types Compared

TypeStructureBest ForResearch Says
Linear (LP)Volume down, Intensity up over weeksBeginnersSimple, effective
Daily Undulating (DUP)Volume/intensity vary each sessionIntermediate+Slight edge for strength
Block3-4 week focused phasesAdvanced, peakingGood for competitions
Weekly Undulating (WUP)Vary week to weekAll levelsFlexible

Research Findings

For Hypertrophy: LP and DUP produce similar results.

For Strength: DUP may have a slight advantage in trained lifters.

  • One study: LP = 18.2% bench increase, DUP = 25.08% increase
  • However, no statistically significant difference in most studies

Practical Recommendation

Beginners    -> Linear Periodization (simple, effective)
Intermediate -> DUP or Block (more variety)
Advanced -> Block periodization (specific adaptations)

Bottom Line: The best periodization is the one you'll follow consistently. Monotonous training leads to stagnation.

Sources: Stronger by Science, PMC


Pillar 9: Recovery & Deload

Deload Frequency by Training Status

Training StatusDeload EveryNotes
Beginner8-10 weeksLess accumulated fatigue
Intermediate4-6 weeksStandard recommendation
Advanced3-4 weeksHigher training stress
In caloric deficitMore frequentlyReduced recovery capacity

Research-Based Deload Protocol

VariableDuring DeloadRationale
Duration~1 week (6.4 +/- 1.7 days)Research average
VolumeReduce 40-60%Main fatigue driver
IntensityKeep same or reduce slightlyMaintain adaptations
FrequencyKeep sameMaintain skill
Exercise selectionKeep sameMaintain patterns

Signs You Need a Deload

Physical Signs:

  • Strength declining for 2+ sessions
  • Lingering soreness >48 hours
  • Elevated resting heart rate
  • Getting sick frequently

Mental Signs:

  • Motivation gone for multiple sessions
  • Dreading the gym
  • Sleep disrupted

Key Finding

Complete rest during deload may actually hurt strength. Reduced training > no training.

Sources: PMC, PMC


Pillar 10: External Factors

What happens outside the gym is as important as what happens inside.

Sleep

FactorRecommendationImpact
Duration7-9 hours (athletes may need more)MPS, hormone regulation
QualityConsistent schedule, dark roomRecovery quality
DeprivationImpairs protein synthesisDirectly reduces gains

Research Finding: Sleep-deprived individuals make worse nutrition choices and have elevated cortisol.

Nutrition

FactorGuidelinePurpose
Protein1.6-2.2g per kg bodyweightMuscle protein synthesis
TimingDistribute protein across mealsMaximize MPS
CaloriesAligned with goalSurplus for growth, deficit for fat loss

Stress Management

  • Training stress + Life stress = Total recovery load
  • Chronic stress elevates cortisol -> impaired recovery
  • Must account for both when programming volume

Muscle Balance (Push:Pull Ratio)

RatioStatusRisk
1:1IdealBalanced development
1.5:1 (push heavy)Common imbalanceShoulder injury risk
2:1+Significant imbalanceHigh injury risk

Research Finding: Programs often neglect posterior chain and stabilizers (rotator cuff, lower trap), leading to injury risk.

Sources: PMC, PMC


Pillar Integration: How Mo Uses the 10 Pillars

interface PlanGenerationInput {
// User inputs from wizard
goal: Goal;
frequency: number;
sessionDuration: number;
equipment: string[];
experience: ExperienceLevel;
recovery: RecoveryProfile;
constraints: Constraints;
}

function generatePlan(input: PlanGenerationInput): WorkoutPlan {
// Pillar 1: Calculate volume
const weeklyVolume = calculateVolume(input.experience, input.goal, input.recovery);

// Pillar 3: Determine frequency and split
const split = determineSplit(input.frequency, weeklyVolume);

// Pillar 5: Select exercises
const exercises = selectExercises(input.goal, input.equipment, input.constraints);

// Pillar 2 & 7: Assign intensity and tempo
const prescriptions = assignPrescriptions(exercises, input.goal, input.experience);

// Pillar 4: Set rest periods
const restPeriods = calculateRest(input.goal, exercises);

// Pillar 8: Build periodization
const phases = buildPeriodization(input.goal, input.experience);

// Pillar 9: Schedule deloads
const deloads = scheduleDeloads(input.experience, input.recovery);

// Pillar 6: Create progression model
const progression = createProgression(input.experience);

// Pillar 10: Add recovery recommendations
const recoveryTips = generateRecoveryTips(input.recovery);

return assemblePlan({ split, exercises, prescriptions, restPeriods, phases, deloads, progression, recoveryTips });
}


Last Updated: 2025-12-08